Opinion
Piece by Luke Herbert
In
this article I have chosen not to cover the influence of Russian
engineering and design on the research and development of jet engines
for the People's Liberation Air force . Nor will the reader find a
complete a list of jet engines in service or under going testing for
the People's Liberation Air Force. Both points are well documented
elsewhere and as such do not meet my aim of bringing the reader
content that you will only find under The Lens of History.
I
believe that western commentators are short sighted when they are
quick to dismiss the Chinese Aviation industry's capacity to develop
and manufacture jet engines for the People’s Liberation Air Force
Let us take a step back for a moment and consider that while the
Chinese engineers will have used the Russian jet engines as the basis
of there design work they will have undertaken research and
development to meet there own design targets.
Since
the need for common components is a tenement of successful mass
production of items that can vary from the TV in your living room to
aircraft , I believe that versatile jet engine designs that can be
use in multiple aircraft designs is a central goal of the Chinese
military aviation industry. Likely they will be working on say two
variants of a jet engine design one for transport aircraft like the
Y-20 and the replacement for the Xian H-6 strategic bomber and the
second variant for smaller more nimble aircraft like the J-31
multi role Stealth combat aircraft.
This
approach I believe can be seen in the number of variants Shenyang
WS-10 jet engine that has been under development for around a decade.
WS-10 – original design producing a thrust of 126 kilonewtons (28,000 lbf)
WS-10A – improved variant producing a thrust of 130 kilonewtons (29,000 lbf)
WS-10B – upgraded variant producing a thrust of 135 kilonewtons (30,000 lbf)
WS-10G – upgraded variant producing a thrust of 155 kilonewtons (35,000 lbf) with Thrust Vectoring and stealthy nozzles that have jagged edges and tiles
WS-20 – derived variant with high-bypass ratio and none afterburner to power the Y-20 transport. 138 kilonewtons (31,000 lb)
During
World War 2 the Merlin engine powered aircraft from the Spitfire to
the Lancaster bomber which proved a single aircraft engine design
could be very successfully utilised in aircraft that served very
different purposes. The example of the Merlin engine also proves that
an aircraft engine that can serve multiple design platforms is not
unprecedented.
Both
the ease of supply of spare parts from a manufacturing standpoint ,
common repair and maintenance procedures all come with the multiple
aircraft engine design approach. The reader may consider this akin to
when a common make of car is taken in by its owner for a service both
spare parts and qualified auto mechanics are readily available.
Another
down side is that greater engine performance that would come from
more specialised designs that are paired with an aircraft is
sacrificed , but this is within keeping with the Chinese design
philosophy that I have outlined above.
The
opposite approach of having specialist jet engine designs tied to
separate aircraft would be like taking an obscure model and make of
car for a service and finding that no qualified auto mechanics or
spare parts available. The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning
II is powered by the F135 engine provides the reader with but one
example of combat aircraft that the reader could consider as being
being the obscure model and make of car in my comparison.
Time
and a future war will be the testing ground of my hypothesis that I
have presented to the reader. Should I be proven to be correct in a
future war United States and allied countries design and production
school of thought will change to providing the common make and model
of car , err I mean jet engines and aircraft.